Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed in the log pages and in the candidate archives. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions (“alternatives”) of the image as well as delist-and-replace nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Hint: Until summer 2025, the bot was also not able to process FPXed, FPDed and withdrawn nominations as well as delist nominations; this has been fixed, users do not need to close such nominations anymore. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 9 May 2026 at 10:52:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Organs
Info Organ of Herzogenburg Monastery church, Herzogenburg, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 May 2026 at 08:15:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created by Patrick Myers – uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot – nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp enough for FP, bad crop at right. Yann (talk) 11:04, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 May 2026 at 08:10:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
Info created by Samuel Eckholm – uploaded by Drakosh – nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Could be a little bit sharper, but still an impressive shot with a dramatic background! --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 09:16, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 May 2026 at 05:42:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Sciuridae_(Squirrels)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:42, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:42, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment I more like 1st version. --Mile (talk) 09:21, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 May 2026 at 04:34:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather#Fog
Info Put van Nederhorst in the mist. Half-uprooted living birch on the shore of the lake in the mist. This uprooted birch still has contact with the soil at the bottom of its root ball, meaning the birch is still alive. Over time, a new sapling has grown at the top of the root ball. The scene is beautifully showcased against the misty background.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:34, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:34, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose -- Sorry doesn't have a wow factor for me Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 May 2026 at 21:46:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing people
Info Swiss Guard in Arco delle Campane (Vatican City). Сreated by Radek Kucharski – uploaded/nominated by me --Юрий Д.К. 21:46, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Юрий Д.К. 21:46, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:54, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 03:56, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support beautiful scene --Famberhorst (talk) 04:55, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:25, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Level of detail could be a bit better, but the composition makes it work for me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 09:05, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:57, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:07, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Lets say agree with Aciarium. Was shallow DoF so good here ? I think he could use more closed aperture, taking fence above guard more sharp, and removing CA which is visible behind (annoted). --Mile (talk) 10:15, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 May 2026 at 13:42:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#North Macedonia
Info created by Деан Лазаревски – uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:42, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:42, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support I like it. --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:25, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 May 2026 at 13:23:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae#Genus : Parantica
Info No FPs of butterfly or plant species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:21, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:24, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Very nice! Textbook quality. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 09:01, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 May 2026 at 10:58:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Marko osmanovic photo – nominated by -- Mile (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Info Portrait of a young girl in a folklore dress (enterance to Pirot fortress, Serbia).
Support Great composition, nice & sharp portrait in a folklore dress of southern Serbia. -- Mile (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment What about personality rights in Serbia --Ezarateesteban 11:09, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Commenti have model release for this photo shooting and for this photo ~2026-26066-53 (talk) 11:29, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Info Added "Personality rights warning". --Mile (talk) 13:01, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Expressive and appealing portrait in a well-composed frame. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:11, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:42, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Very nice. TheBritinator (talk) 13:44, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support very nice --Ezarateesteban 19:05, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Selbymay (talk) 19:48, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 22:17, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 22:46, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:22, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support per anderen.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:57, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:23, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support High-quality portrait, good lighting, nice colors. The doors provide excellent framing. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 09:01, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:06, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 May 2026 at 10:29:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Physalacriaceae
Info Porcelain fungus (Oudemansiella mucida) on dead beech wood in the Rülzheim Forest (South Palatinate), various growth stages. Created, uploaded and nominated by me -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 10:29, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Abstain as author. -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 10:29, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Great photo. --Alex Florstein (talk) 11:36, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:22, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support beautiful composition.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:23, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 08:06, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Keep it up with the fungi! Pleasant photo as always. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 08:56, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:05, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 May 2026 at 09:30:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:30, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:30, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Kiril Simeonovski Дали проба да се намали портокалова/жолта, или вајт баланс да се намали ? --Mile (talk) 11:05, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- @PetarM: Во право си. Подигнав нова верзија со пореалистични бои. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:11, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support I taka. --Mile (talk) 13:10, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:22, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:03, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
The three main types of Vexillum exasperatum
Voting period ends on 8 May 2026 at 08:31:17 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
About 10 ribs per turn
-
About 15 ribs per turn
-
About 15 ribs per turn
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Costellariidae
Info There are three main types in the species Vexillum exasperatum which differ in the number of ribs per turn; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:26, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:28, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:33, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support ExZellEnt set! JayCubby (talk) 15:12, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support per JayCubby !--Jebulon (talk) 20:17, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:23, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:22, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 10:47, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 May 2026 at 05:35:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Others
Info created by US Postal Service – uploaded by Dragonhawk12 – nominated by Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 05:35, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 05:35, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
| Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Too small, please read the quidelines. Yann (talk) 09:27, 29 April 2026 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Voting period ends on 8 May 2026 at 00:44:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Falcão Alado -- Falcão Alado (talk) 00:44, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Falcão Alado (talk) 00:44, 29 April 2026 (UTC)- Top crop too short. Yann (talk) 09:30, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Why do we have double standards? Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 10:46, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- What double standards? I agree that the top crop is too tight. TheBritinator (talk) 13:45, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- I agree as well – Julian Lupyan (talk) 14:39, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- +1 --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 08:53, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
- I agree as well – Julian Lupyan (talk) 14:39, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- What double standards? I agree that the top crop is too tight. TheBritinator (talk) 13:45, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Why do we have double standards? Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 10:46, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 May 2026 at 21:13:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info Tree in a field in Oberköst, Upper Franconia, orthophoto. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:13, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:13, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Steven Sun (talk) 10:30, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Interesting perspective. TheBritinator (talk) 13:46, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:24, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:21, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support As always: nice perspective and composition. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 08:52, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:02, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 May 2026 at 20:59:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Paris
Info High altar of Cathedral of Saint-Louis-des-Invalides, Paris, France. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment The verticals aren't quite right when you look at the lamp cables. Otherwise, everything is fine.--Ermell (talk) 21:19, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Ermell: True,
fixed, thank you Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Ermell: True,
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:08, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 May 2026 at 12:06:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Passeridae_(Old_world_sparrows)
Info created by Petro Stelte – uploaded by Petro Stelte – nominated by Petro Stelte -- Petro Stelte (talk) 12:06, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Found this while I was pruning my olive trees. Don't worry, I took the photo and then immediately left, leaving the tree untouched. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 12:06, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 05:14, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Balanced centering and natural framing, fine detail of nest and hatchlings. Technically clean, with strong educational value through insight into nesting and early development. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:57, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 15:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Jebulon (talk) 20:32, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:05, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 May 2026 at 07:41:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
Info created by ikonact – uploaded by Ikonact – nominated by Ikonact
Info Geographic map of Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark. The map is full vector format. Source of data is in public domain. -- Ikonact (talk) 07:41, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment A map has to be accurate to be useful. It is not accurate in parts of the country where I've driven, e.g. Oppdal is not near the road or railway. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:55, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- yes, thanks. I can correct this. GIven the huge area I used simplified data and some of the points may be not very accurate and do nto match with other data. Ikonact (talk) 12:06, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- I think you'll find there are too many errors for an easy correction. Bodo larger than Tronheim? Bothnia bay (Bay)... Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:53, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- yes, thanks. I can correct this. GIven the huge area I used simplified data and some of the points may be not very accurate and do nto match with other data. Ikonact (talk) 12:06, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Ikonact (talk) 21:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 May 2026 at 07:12:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info created by JackyM59 – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 07:12, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 07:12, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Info Fort-Mahon-Plage SNSM (French Sea Rescue Society) lifeguard station, at the end of the day. --JackyM59 (talk) 07:51, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice composition to me. Maybe a bit tight at the top.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:07, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:21, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:01, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Neither the subject nor the composition convince me, sorry --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:32, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 May 2026 at 04:37:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Switzerland
Info The main altar decorated with beautiful floral arrangements.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:37, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:37, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Question Getting ready for the October harvest festival? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:58, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Answer: Due to our age, we live more in the present and don't look too much to the future, but we do love the month of October.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:53, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:20, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 May 2026 at 21:18:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/2000s#2010-2019
Info created by Pete Souza – uploaded by Goodvac – nominated by وسيم وسيم (talk) 21:18, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support وسيم (talk) 21:18, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment Fixed the unmodified/broken gallery link. —brainandforce [yap] 00:28, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you, Brainandforce! – Aristeas (talk) 09:39, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support High historical value. TheBritinator (talk) 00:39, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support as per TheBritinator. Special thanks to Brainandforce for fixing the gallery link. I've further refined the gallery to …/Historical/2000s#2010-2019. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:54, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment I am not sure yet, if the historical value can overcome the artistic and technical problems. I am most disturbed by the cut off parts of persons in the lower left and on the right. --Kritzolina (talk) 18:18, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Crop, persons cut, DoF - especially in president. Background, noise. I don't see some historical value here. --Mile (talk) 07:58, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:53, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Unrelated to any political dimension of this, I am still impressed by this photo every time I see it. Yes, the technical quality could in fact be better, but this is (at least in my opinion) clearly outweighed by how well this tense situation was captured. Iconic photo and (per others) high historic value. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 08:49, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 May 2026 at 18:42:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#Nevada
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Gzzz -- Gzzz zz 18:42, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Gzzz zz 18:42, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Ça, c’est du haut niveau.--Jebulon (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- Merci :-) Gzzz zz 20:03, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Je suis un peu curieux de savoir d’où cette photo a été prise! --Wilfredor (talk) 20:43, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- À hauteur d'homme, depuis le milieu de la route :-) Mais comme la route est en descente, on peut avoir l'impression que je suis en hauteur, ce qui n'est pas le cas --Gzzz zz 21:36, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
- Je comprends, merci pour l'explication Wilfredor (talk) 21:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- À hauteur d'homme, depuis le milieu de la route :-) Mais comme la route est en descente, on peut avoir l'impression que je suis en hauteur, ce qui n'est pas le cas --Gzzz zz 21:36, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:56, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 05:15, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support good compo. --Mile (talk) 08:01, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you :-) Gzzz zz 20:03, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:32, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:35, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:27, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:28, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:53, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:37, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:26, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 05:13, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:19, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice composition. The road does a very good job at guiding the viewer's eyes across the photo. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 08:35, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 11:10, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 May 2026 at 15:11:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Camelidae_(Camelids)
Info Decorated one-humped Camel, Camelus dromedarius, at Puri Sea Beach, Odisha, India. Previously nominated but rejected due to masking issues. Recreated from RAW. Renominated. Created, uploaded, nominated by. -- Joydeep (Talk) 15:11, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Abstain as author.-- Joydeep (Talk) 15:11, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Good now. Yann (talk) 15:29, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Selbymay (talk) 18:22, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Lovely all around. —brainandforce [yap] 00:57, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:14, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:27, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:27, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:53, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:26, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:14, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:19, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Strong support I remember the original nomination and I appreciate the very successful re-editing! This is the post-processing quality the shot "deserves". --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 08:32, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 May 2026 at 13:55:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
Info all by me -- Ezarateesteban 13:55, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 13:55, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Question Are you clear on the Personality Rights laws in BrazilArgentina? Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:57, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- yes...but this photo is in Argentina not Brazil...PR tag added just in case --Ezarateesteban 17:21, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing featureable here, sorry. The decision to put the rest of the image in black and white is odd to me — it isn't even that well done to be honest, looks like a layer was hastily brushed over(e.g. random ground spots and corner of chair). TheBritinator (talk) 01:02, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 May 2026 at 08:19:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Thuringia
Info Mödlareuth with inner German border and watch tower, taken on German reunification day, created by PantheraLeo1359531 – uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 – nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:19, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:19, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but nothing special, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:23, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile Morin --Joydeep (Talk) 15:19, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 15:41:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather#Sun
Info created by the_dead_pixel – uploaded by A1Cafel – nominated by ★ -- ★ 15:41, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 15:41, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 21:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:52, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 12:41:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment CA on the top of the towers, otherwise good. Yann (talk) 12:58, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Simple, classical. Of course excellent light. High historical and educational value. I like it !--Jebulon (talk) 19:22, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Without distractions such as visitors or cars. Super clean. -- It's moon (talk) 20:45, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:48, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Joydeep (Talk) 15:41, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose @Tournasol7 Top part (third) is so-so with quality, at least you could solve a much visible CA. --Mile (talk) 17:59, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:52, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 10:48, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 12:38:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Guadeloupe
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:38, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:38, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:48, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 17:13, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:06, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Looks nice, but not a picture I'd use for my desktop. Probably I'm spoilt after doing some sailing around Madagascar (picture will come soon), not sure. The grey sky, the color of the water, the rocks in the water, sorry, not paradisiac Poco a poco (talk) 19:46, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:12, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 13:52, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Jebulon (talk) 20:40, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 04:27, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:18, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 12:13:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Painted_ceilings
Info Fresco in Sevnica Castle hall, Slovenia. One of around 5 frescos in that hall, so i named it Fresco I... My shot. -- Mile (talk) 12:13, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 12:13, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:49, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 05:40, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Joydeep (Talk) 16:13, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:26, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:11, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:25, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 10:51:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Jewellery_and_objects_of_precious_metals
Info Arm reliquary of Charlemagne in Aachen Cathedral Treasury
Info I am new on Commons, so please be kind to me :)
Info created by Mituxy – uploaded by Mituxy – nominated by Mituxy -- Mituxy (talk) 10:55, 26 April 2026 (UTC)-- Mituxy (talk) 10:55, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Neutral
- @Mituxy: Why don't you support your own picture? Yann (talk) 12:29, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Thank you for this hint, Yann I checked the rules again, and it seems that supporting one’s own nominations is allowed after all, even though I am still very new here. Mituxy (talk) 17:41, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Mituxy: Why don't you support your own picture? Yann (talk) 12:29, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment This must be quite tricky to photograph and the background has been done well. Perhaps the highlights could be reduced and the shadows lifted? Unfortunately, I don't think your Z50 has focus-shift-shooting like your friend's Z8. That gives him an advantageǃ But your shot of the Margaret crown is much sharper than his recently-promoted FPC and I prefer your slightly lower PoV. Without focus-stacking, the bottom of the relic is blurred. Although, it doesn't matter for Commons FPC, but I would put the image into the Charlemagne deWiki article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:03, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for the kind and detailed feedback, Charlesjsharp also about the crown — maybe I will nominate the crown too, just to tease my friend a little. :)
- Unfortunately, the Z50 does not have focus shift. I will try later to add the image to the article on Charlemagne — thank you for that suggestion as well. Mituxy (talk) 17:48, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:15, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:49, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 05:47, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Detail at top and bottom not at FP level IMHO, sorry. Too shallow DoF. Poco a poco (talk) 06:44, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Poco is right, I’m afraid.--Jebulon (talk) 20:28, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 09:12:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Corse-du-Sud
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Gzzz -- Gzzz zz 09:12, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Gzzz zz 09:12, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:02, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:14, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Tournasol7: Do you support or...? Yann (talk) 13:00, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, sorry, my mistake. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:26, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:08, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 21:48, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:50, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 05:39, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Joydeep (Talk) 16:17, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:56, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:24, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Jebulon (talk) 20:46, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 03:39:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Iceland#Southern_Region_(Suðurland)
Info Gullfoss waterfall in southern Iceland in early spring, with patches of remaining snow. All by me -- Jakubhal 03:39, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 03:39, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Impressive place. --Yann (talk) 13:01, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:59, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:09, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 05:39, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Detail is not the best but detail is great Poco a poco (talk) 06:33, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 17:13, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:55, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:23, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:45, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:10, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Jebulon (talk) 20:47, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 May 2026 at 00:40:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Uzbekistan
Info created by Kraftabbas – uploaded by Kraftabbas – nominated by Wakobear -- Wakobear (talk) 00:40, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Wakobear (talk) 00:40, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:03, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:14, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:47, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:10, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support 2011 photo! JayCubby (talk) 21:11, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 05:38, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but a balanced compo and symmetry is important for this kind of shot, the image is crooked Poco a poco (talk) 06:35, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco a poco--Joydeep (Talk) 16:18, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support I think the unbalanced composition works here. This feels like the perspective of a visitor looking up and admiring the artwork rather than a meticulously planned photo, and that's not a bad thing. —brainandforce [yap] 00:35, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:09, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:21, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 May 2026 at 22:14:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#China
Info created and uploaded by Ermell – nominated by ★ -- ★ 22:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support A 2007 photo but still good. -- ★ 22:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:01, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:13, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nom.--Ermell (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:42, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:08, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 13:48, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:52, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:17, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 May 2026 at 09:40:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info created by User:GPhoto15 – uploaded by GPhoto15 – nominated by Nayan j Nath -- Nayan j Nath (talk) 09:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Nayan j Nath (talk) 09:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment I don't think this is the right category for this image, it should probably be Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions. —brainandforce [yap] 23:01, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support I have fixed category per Brainandforce -- Jakubhal 03:45, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support I added a few categories on the image itself, as I love the authentic feeling and the action shown in this picture. We don't often get good images from Assam and this one is showing an important tradition in an excellent way. --Kritzolina (talk) 07:55, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support —brainandforce [yap] 09:12, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:13, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Strong support for good quality and cultural representation! Nice work -AjayDas (talk) 10:18, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:47, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:59, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 12:25, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:56, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:36, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Joydeep (Talk) 16:20, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 17:15, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:08, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The crop/framing doesn't work out for me, sadly. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 08:21, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
File:104 Juvenile South African ostrich in the Kalahari Desert of Namibia Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
Voting period ends on 4 May 2026 at 09:04:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Struthionidae_(Ostriches)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:04, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:04, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:24, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:30, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support The bushes provide excellent framing. —brainandforce [yap] 19:08, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 03:41, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:24, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:13, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:00, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 12:25, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:51, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:37, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Joydeep (Talk) 16:21, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:22, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:07, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:35, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 13:48, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:38, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:28, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Per brainandforce. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 08:20, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 May 2026 at 09:01:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Elephantidae_(Elephants)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support The spots in the sky are probably insects?--Ermell (talk) 09:25, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, it's insects -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:29, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 12:52, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- beautiful light for this shot. E bailey (talk) 16:47, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:40, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:24, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:00, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 12:26, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:52, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:37, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Joydeep (Talk) 16:23, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:40, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Gzzz zz 20:04, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:21, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:07, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:35, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:29, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Strong support A very good shot in many ways! This is the kind of photo you would find in a textbook. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 08:20, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 May 2026 at 04:14:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Fratercula
Info Atlantic puffin carrying seaweed and vegetation. All by me -- Jakubhal 04:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 04:14, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support —brainandforce [yap] 06:13, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:27, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:28, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 12:27, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:52, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:39, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Joydeep (Talk) 16:23, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:39, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:32, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:21, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:20, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:35, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 May 2026 at 17:53:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Telescopes
Info My own Ritchey–Chrétien telescope imaging the Dumbbell Nebula at early dawn in a tennis court, behind Sagittarius, Scorpius, and the core of the Milky Way. Created, uploaded, and nominated by yours truly —brainandforce [yap] 17:53, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Abstain as author. —brainandforce [yap] 17:53, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment I already have an FP of this telescope, but the lighting is much better here (thanks, light pollution?). I wasn't sure whether this should be a delist/replace nomination or not.
Support I think this is much better than the other picture. Yann (talk) 19:17, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:12, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 12:28, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:35, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 May 2026 at 01:01:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Italy
Info A dreamy view onto the private pier of Hotel Astor at Lake Garda in Italy. The backlit green seawater and the pink blossoms on the tree convey an almost unnatural color impression which is quite striking to me. However, the hues were not significantly altered - this is very close to the natural colors of this interestingly-lit early-spring scene. All by me. -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 01:01, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 01:01, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Very interesting and original. Maybe a slight crop above and right would help? --Jebulon (talk) 19:33, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Jebulon:
Done Thanks for the advice, I wasn't too happy with the crop in the first place and finally adjusted it. Also pinging @Famberhorst and @Kiril Simeonovski since they already voted as well. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 22:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Jebulon:
Support per Jebulon--Famberhorst (talk) 17:35, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:35, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:51, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 May 2026 at 17:10:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Primates#Family : Tarsiidae (Tarsiers)
Info I know I submitted this one only last month... All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:10, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:10, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:39, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 00:12, 24 April 2026 (UTC)- Weak
Support. Bottom cut is a bit tight. --Yann (talk) 09:17, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 09:21, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:15, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Very similar to the recently promoted FP taken at the same time. Only 3 images of this species, having 2 as FP would be much. --Tagooty (talk) 14:42, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- No worries Tagooty I've a bunch of images of this species, I'll upload them within 2 months I hope Poco a poco (talk) 15:47, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- Possibly the most bizarre oppose yet, from a regular contributor who has just supported an elephant image for FP when we have 20+ already. And how is it similar to the other? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:57, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 04:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Crested Bunting
Voting period ends on 2 May 2026 at 06:09:25 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Crested Bunting (Emberiza lathami) male in Saswad, Maharashtra, India.
-
Crested Bunting (Emberiza lathami) female in Saswad, Maharashtra, India.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Emberizidae_(Buntings)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:09, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:09, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support —brainandforce [yap] 20:21, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support High quality and attractive pair of images that are the best of this species on Commons. Gatoclass (talk) 01:37, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:08, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 05:29, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:15, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 May 2026 at 19:49:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains_and_water_features
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 19:49, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I dislike "drama effect" shadows - to much black. I would raise shadows and put colors more to "ivory-white color" looking. --Mile (talk) 09:27, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- I think the colors are more accurate than this other FP which, in IMHO, does seem dramatic. Wilfredor (talk) 11:25, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment That is even more strange. Suppose he want that kind. --Mile (talk) 09:53, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Support I like it. TheBritinator (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment The horizontal perspective correction is not perfect.--Jebulon (talk) 20:15, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
- J’ai essayé de trouver un guide, mais pour moi, tout a l’air symétrique Wilfredor (talk) 20:45, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- La corniche, tout en haut…--Jebulon (talk) 21:33, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- C'est fait, stp, dis-moi si ça marche pour toi. Wilfredor (talk) 21:42, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- Merci c’est mieux.--Jebulon (talk) 10:22, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Merci a toi Wilfredor (talk) 13:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Merci c’est mieux.--Jebulon (talk) 10:22, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- C'est fait, stp, dis-moi si ça marche pour toi. Wilfredor (talk) 21:42, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- La corniche, tout en haut…--Jebulon (talk) 21:33, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- J’ai essayé de trouver un guide, mais pour moi, tout a l’air symétrique Wilfredor (talk) 20:45, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 09:02, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:11, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:02, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 12:34, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:55, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:51, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support ★ 03:56, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 May 2026 at 19:32:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#France
Info High altar of the Basilica of Saints Nazarius and Celsus, citadel of Carcassonne, France. The original church is thought to have been constructed in the 6th century during the reign of Theodoric the Great, ruler of the Visigoths. In 1096, Pope Urban II visited the town and blessed the building materials for the construction of the cathedral, which was completed in the first half of the 12th century. Around the end of the 13th century, during the rule of kings Philip III, Philip IV, and the episcopates of Pierre de Rochefort and Pierre Rodier, the cathedral was reconstructed in the Gothic style. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:32, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:32, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The composition is extremely unbalanced, and the framing in the foreground is far too tight. In addition, there is a lack of sharpness in the details toward the top of the frame. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 03:33, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:05, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:23, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:40, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Works for me visually and atmospherically. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:03, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:20, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:08, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 12:35, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support the escutcheon of CoA (clé de voute) is distorted, but otherwise it is an excellent picture.--Jebulon (talk) 19:40, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:35, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:51, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose It is a nice photo; sadly, however, there is some significant distortion due to PC, especially toward the edges. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 08:12, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 May 2026 at 19:16:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
Info Wolt delivery man having a rest (Belgrade, Serbia). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Support I prefer photos that tell stories over photos of spectacular monuments. It takes more skill to find something special in the everyday than to photograph something that is already impressive in itself. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but this picture does not tell me nothing. In my opinion, I don’t find anything special here.--Jebulon (talk) 20:18, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Jebulon. Nothing compelling here. Gatoclass (talk) 23:36, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per Jebulon. TheBritinator (talk) 09:12, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:12, 25 April 2026 (UTC)- Yes, it tells a story. But it looks like yellowish. Why not plain black and white? Yann (talk) 21:52, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
Info @Yann due to capturing colors, Wolt to be more visible. --Mile (talk)
I withdraw my nomination low support --Mile (talk)
Support I'm late here. This is really an interesting photo. Waiting for more photos that tell stories. --Steven Sun (talk) 10:40, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 May 2026 at 16:23:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Photo art
Info Fagus sylvatica with autumn leaf color. Taken in the biosphere reserve Rhoen in Germany November 2023. Created by Markusmachtphotos – uploaded by Markusmachtphotos – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 16:23, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Zquid (talk) 16:23, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:30, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Support A really beautiful photo that really captures your attention. I might have just moved the tree trunk a little more toward the lower right corner. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 03:42, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose A deserved 1st prize winner at WLE, no doubt about its striking composition and visual impact. However, at full resolution the technical quality falls short of FP standards. Visible compression artifacts and loss of fine detail are apparent, particularly given the high resolution (~42 MP) combined with a small file size. The technical execution does not match the image's otherwise exceptional quality. Sorry. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:58, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Radomianin It won 1st place, it could won, since jury is more watching thumbs than true size. So this is what i say "good in thumb - bad in full" or other way around. I could agree with technical, as i see, wide zoom is used, going into fisheye specter. Doing shot on 14 mm (@FF), f/13, 1/100s and ISO 2000 is not good choice. Or ideal. I see Exposure Program was Manual. So mistake probably. Due to humidity i dont think he could capture objects sharp far from camera. --Mile (talk) 09:11, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Jebulon (talk) 20:22, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:18, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:09, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The compression artifacts are bad enough to be disqualifying, IMO. Can you dig up a higher quality version of this image? I'd support that for sure. —brainandforce [yap] 17:37, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Brainandforce, I am able to reduce the JPEG artifacts using a neutral network, but if you have a decent GPU, I'll send you the program (it will take a couple hours to run but maybe 15 minutes on a decent graphics card) JayCubby (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2026 (UTC)
- Beautiful photo with some technical problems per users above. I've decided to
Weak support this Юрий Д.К. 20:12, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 09:03, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support As photo art.--Ermell (talk) 09:35, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Quality is too low, unfortunately -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Certainly a nice photo, but not up to FP standards when it comes to the technical aspects. This is very unfortunate, as there's simply no reason to downsize it that much. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:42, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:35, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Quality is low, but the guideline allows some lack of technical quality for wow photos. The author seems not active on Commons, otherwise we could ask him to reupload this photo. --Steven Sun (talk) 10:29, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:51, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Per others: very nice shot, but sadly with quality issues. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 08:09, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 May 2026 at 08:17:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info The small wind farm near Hatzenbühl in the municipality of Jockgrim (Southern Palatinate) on a windy day. Created, uploaded and nominated by me -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 08:17, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Abstain as author. No, I didn't pull the plug of the foremost wind turbine just to get that shot. But I had returned home to get the ND filter. 😁 -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 08:17, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Wow factor is limited in my view. The grey clouds don't help much, either. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:17, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
- But you know, where there's wind, clouds aren't far behind. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 13:50, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
- Windy places do not inherently have "more" clouds. But grey on grey... And a lot of empty space here. -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:58, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:26, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree, it looks too ordinary to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 20:00, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment I love the idea (a stopped turbine with moving ones in the background, great use case for an ND filter) and the composition (for me, the negative space works well), but agree with Basile about the grey clouds. Have you tried increasing whites just on the background, to avoid clipping the wind towers and blades? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:58, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing featurable here imo, sorry. TheBritinator (talk) 13:35, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment Thank you very much for your suggestions, @Julesvernex2. I’ve already tried a few things in that direction, but the rotating wind turbines are almost impossible to mask. Right now, I don’t feel like working on the photo any further, and with the nice weather, I’d rather spend my time on botanical topics.
I took and nominated this photo because I find it funny and think it’s a nice change of pace from the usual topics here. It may not appeal to everyone, and some might even find it boring. That’s fine with me — at least those are honest opinions.
What I can’t get behind, however, are comments like “too much empty space” or “the gray clouds don’t help much”. Frankly, I consider that an unqualified statement you’d expect from a layperson. Maybe it’s just a translation error.
Here, wind turbines several dozen meters high are photographed from the ground, and I think I’ve managed the composition quite well. What would you expect as a background with this POV? Some kind of aircraft on approach? A murmuration of birds? At any rate, the low-pressure system that had built up from the west fits very well into the image’s narrative.
I’m leaving the nomination up anyway and would appreciate feedback that goes beyond mere grumbling or snide remarks. Thanks! --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 07:39, 24 April 2026 (UTC)- Weak
Support. Clouds and sky are fine. I find the center composition not the best. Did you try to use the rule of third? --Yann (talk) 09:22, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, Yann. I usually compose my images based on the “golden ratio” or the Fibonacci sequence (as far as possible). That didn't quite work out here due to the dimensions of the subject. Right a bit less and therefore left a bit more space would have been better, sure. Cropping to a 4:3 or 5:4 aspect ratio doesn't really offer any advantages, so I left it as is, leaving the final decision up to the end user. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 03:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose You need more time to get blades around and around. At day, this must be more than some 15 stops, i think. Colors could be more vivid or enlightened. --Mile (talk) 10:07, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
- I also took some shots of this subject with much longer exposure times, but I discarded them because I didn’t want the rotor blades to appear as circles. A full rotation would have taken about 20–30 seconds, which I wouldn’t have been able to manage at all in daylight. Have you ever tried that in practice, or is it just theory? What’s your experience with variable ND filters and the sensors and light meters in modern cameras? 😉 Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 03:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:51, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 May 2026 at 08:11:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Denmark
Info Kronborg Castle with its surrounding moats and defensive ramparts. The castle is one of Northern Europe’s most impressive Renaissance castles and famously serves as the setting for Shakespeare’s drama Hamlet. Located just six kilometers from Denmark’s historic archenemy Sweden, across the Öresund strait, Kronborg has always been heavily fortified and remained an active military base well into the 20th century. Somewhat surprisingly, we still have no FPs of this remarkable world heritage site.- Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 08:11, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 08:11, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice composition and lighting of an interesting object. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 08:20, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Support It just invites you to take in all the detail and colors. —brainandforce [yap] 15:37, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:25, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I don't think this was the best POV for this subject. We see mostly an uninteresting brick wall and little from the castle Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per vote above --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:08, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support In my opinion, the photo from this side is also very impressive.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:13, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support-- JackyM59 (talk) 18:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco. Gatoclass (talk) 23:29, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose I've been sitting on this for a few days and while I think it's a very well taken photo I'm not sold by the angle, sorry. TheBritinator (talk) 09:26, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose @ArildV F-number f/9; bricks are fine, but i more focus on Fort, they lean too. --Mile (talk) 10:10, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment There are several reasons for the composition, the ramparts are very close to the castle and the area closest to the castle (inside the innermost moat) is also not accessible. So there is no way to get a picture of the castle without some part being obscured. The second reason is that the castle is not just a castle; it is also a military fortress that controlled the entrance to the Sound and the Baltic Sea for centuries. So the walls and moats are very much part of the historical value, integrity and authenticity of the site.--ArildV (talk) 10:36, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2026 at 17:42:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
Info: the ancient Roman entrance to the town of Castelmola, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:42, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:42, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
Comment the shadow, left corner...--Jebulon (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
Support Well composed rustic scene that invites imaginative engagement. The stonework is interesting with its different colours and highly varied shapes and sizes, and the angle of light highlights its textures. My one quibble would be that the caption, "Ancient arch", is insufficient. Gatoclass (talk) 16:34, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback! As far as I could find, it doesn't actually have a proper name; it is simply called Arco Antico: [1] I did expand the captions a bit though. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:45, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I fail to see something extraordinary here, and I was also there one year ago. Poco a poco (talk) 19:58, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:35, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:10, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 13:51, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 02:50, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:15, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Sat 25 Apr → Thu 30 Apr Sun 26 Apr → Fri 01 May Mon 27 Apr → Sat 02 May Tue 28 Apr → Sun 03 May Wed 29 Apr → Mon 04 May Thu 30 Apr → Tue 05 May
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Tue 21 Apr → Thu 30 Apr Wed 22 Apr → Fri 01 May Thu 23 Apr → Sat 02 May Fri 24 Apr → Sun 03 May Sat 25 Apr → Mon 04 May Sun 26 Apr → Tue 05 May Mon 27 Apr → Wed 06 May Tue 28 Apr → Thu 07 May Wed 29 Apr → Fri 08 May Thu 30 Apr → Sat 09 May
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- Add candidate archive categories to the nomination so that people can easily find and evaluate past nominations (this applies also to unsuccessful, {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations). It’s best practice to wrap all these categories in a
<noinclude>...</noinclude>section because they apply only to the nomination itself, not to the log page etc. which transclude it. You need three or four categories:- A category for the month and year, like Category:April 2026 featured picture candidates for the current month.
- A category for the type and result of the nomination, like Category:2026 successful candidates for featured picture status; replace “successful” by “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn”, depending on the final result of the nomination (see the supercategory for common values).
- A category for the subject of the nomination, like Category:2026 featured picture candidates of plants. Replace “plants” by one of the possible subject keywords like “animals”, “architecture”, etc.; see the base category for all common keywords. Basically the subject keywords correspond to the first part of the gallery link.
- If the nomination is a set nomination, add Category:2026 featured picture set nominations.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Add candidate archive categories to the nomination; this works the same way as described above for featured picture nominations. The only difference is that the category for type and status must be of the form Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting from featured picture status, or Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting and replacing featured pictures if this is a delist-and-replace nomination. Substitute “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn” for “successful”, depending on the final result of the nomination.
- Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just add candidate archive categories to the nomination itself, then move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.

